Page 1 of 1

unmoved by lust (revised)

Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2018 9:54 am
by Dave
.

Re: unmoved by lust

Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2018 11:19 am
by Tim J Brennan
I love minimalistic poems.    

First read thoughts:  the use of "for" twice in such brevity is too much.  Since I gag (just me) at prepositions on a break line, I would do something w/S2.  

Not sure about the comparison to unmoved dust. All one has to do is walk by a dust bunny and it moves like a dandelion spore. But maybe that's your point: that's you ARE that unmoved. So maybe it works.

On your word choice of "writhing"...it is something I associate more w/pain, and I'm trying to decide why I should care about your apparent lack of testosterone here.  You mention "desire" (and I like that) but since you bite your lip to deter yourself, I'm not sure that's the right word choice, either.      

Last line is the strongest, methinks.  Given the right circumstances, it's visually appealing. 

 



 

Re: unmoved by lust

Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2018 12:07 pm
by indar
I read that final line differently, not of lust withheld but the suffering of some other agony that kills desire. Perhaps these words tell us the cause:

for nothing
but the pleasure
of an animal's warmth

A recognition of the nature of the relationship that makes it repugnant.

Re: unmoved by lust

Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2018 4:12 am
by Dave
Thanks Indar and Tim. My instincts go with Indar#s interpretation.
Tim, you have highlighted aspects I felt undecided about. Dust can go, the two fors are a pain and I have not found a satisfactory replacement for writhing, which in the dictionary is indeed laden with pain although commonly used for erotic contexts and snakes of course. Will post changes.
Dave
 

Re: unmoved by lust (revised)

Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2018 7:37 am
by Tim J Brennan
Revision much cleaner, Dave.  

Indar's interpretation (and your instincts) of that last line doesn't take w/me. Reason: title has me influenced.  You pretty much tell me it's all about lust.  

And I love the last line. I'm just looking at what's coming in front of it.   

Re: unmoved by lust (revised)

Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2018 10:13 am
by indar
Why did you remove "for nothing but" ? I thought that was the tip-off that the N has realized there is no relationship outside the animal need being displayed by the woman on the rug and that is a turn-off for the N.

Re: unmoved by lust (revised)

Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2018 6:04 am
by Dave
Hey Indar
You know how it is:post comment revise comment revise. This is just trying things out, nothing is lost of changed.
Original still exists.
Thanks for returning and appreciate it very much.
Dave

Re: unmoved by lust (revised)

Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2018 6:41 pm
by Colm Roe
For me, the last line was after the N received a box in the face from the rug-lady.
Anywho, the N is in deep shit. Zorba the Greek told us “If a woman sleeps alone it puts a shame on all men. God has a very big heart, but there is one sin He will not forgive. If a woman calls a man to her bed and he will not go.”  A very wise (and obviously very horny) old man told him that  :roll:  
I enjoyed the read. 
And have to ask, are you (considering your latest poem) entering your 'blue' period?