Welcome to The Tangled Branch! Join us.
Thorns
Re: Thorns
I like the original version better, yellow roses especially, though I wonder why you chose not to use an article in S1 (i.e. a chair) but chose to use them in S2, 3, and 5. In such a minimalistic piece, such an inconsistency really stands out.
I must admit I am not familiar with the phrase "footie mad". That threw me a bit.
I must admit I am not familiar with the phrase "footie mad". That threw me a bit.
Re: Thorns
Hi Matty
I have watched the evolution of the roses over the last 24 hrs.
I liked pristine but maybe that was when muddied was in.
innocent roses?
Re: Thorns
Thanks Colm, Niall and Hugh. Yes, precious, could be the simple option, though familiar, or I could go back to yellow. I went for beloved because of love and where his heart is. I tried pristine/serene, but both felt forced. One to put in the nearly drawer for now
cheers
matty
cheers
matty
Re: Thorns
I like "beloved" it heightens the absence of the father who so loved those roses. I also think "thorns" is a good title---might be an overworked comparison to the old idea of "with beauty---pain" but still, the specific pain associated with these particular roses sets it apart.
Re: Thorns
Thanks for taking a look at this Indar. I'm comfortable with the diction, and the content has potential, but the form carries too much WCW baggage.
cheers
matty
cheers
matty
indar wrote: ↑Tue Oct 09, 2018 3:39 pmI like "beloved" it heightens the absence of the father who so loved those roses. I also think "thorns" is a good title---might be an overworked comparison to the old idea of "with beauty---pain" but still, the specific pain associated with these particular roses sets it apart.